By CrossBorder IP · Published May 28, 2026
Intellectual property is often the primary driver of enterprise value in an acquisition. For software companies, it is the codebase. For consumer brands, it is the trademark portfolio. For manufacturers, it is the combination of patents, trade secrets, and know-how that makes the product competitive.
And yet, IP due diligence is still one of the most under-resourced workstreams in M&A transactions. It is often allocated to general corporate counsel rather than specialist IP attorneys, happens too late in the process to affect deal structure or pricing, and routinely misses the issues that matter most.
The result: acquirers close deals with IP problems they did not know about, discover them post-closing when they are expensive to fix, and sometimes discover deal-breaking issues they cannot fix at all.
This guide is a practical IP due diligence framework for PE firms, corporate development teams, and their advisors. It covers what to look for, how to look for it, and what to do when you find problems.
General legal due diligence looks at contracts, litigation history, and corporate structure. IP due diligence goes deeper — it assesses whether the target company actually owns what it claims to own, whether that ownership is defensible, and whether the IP can do what the investment thesis says it can.
The key questions IP due diligence must answer:
The most expensive IP due diligence finding is not a gap in the portfolio — it is discovering post-close that the company does not actually own its core technology because a contractor never signed an assignment agreement.
For every material piece of IP, you need to verify that the target company actually owns it and that ownership is clean and unencumbered. What to examine:
If the target has a patent portfolio, your analysis should cover:
Trademark due diligence is particularly important for consumer brands and SaaS companies with strong brand identity. What to examine:
In cross-border deals, geographic gaps in trademark protection are the most common finding and the most easily quantifiable. Calculate the cost of filing in unprotected markets and factor it into purchase price adjustments.
Trade secrets are the most difficult IP to assess in due diligence — by definition, they are confidential. But they are also often the most valuable IP a company has. Key areas to examine:
IP-related contracts can dramatically affect the value and usability of the IP portfolio post-closing. For in-bound licences (IP the company licences from others):
For out-bound licences (IP the company has licensed to others):
Even if the target’s own IP is clean, the business may be at risk from third-party IP. Freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis asks: is there third-party IP that could block or limit what the business does? FTO analysis is particularly important for technology companies in patent-dense fields (AI, fintech, biotech), and any situation where a competitor is aggressive about IP enforcement. At a minimum, review whether the target has received any infringement claims, cease-and-desist letters, or litigation threats.
Open source software is present in virtually every technology product. The risk is concentrated in copyleft licences — GPL, LGPL, AGPL — that impose obligations to release source code if certain conditions are met. Open source due diligence should include:
Rare but real. Examples: the company does not actually own its core technology; there is a legitimate infringement claim that could enjoin the core product; the primary trademark is subject to a cancellation action with strong grounds. Options: walk away, restructure the deal to exclude the problematic IP, or seek indemnification and escrow arrangements significant enough to cover the worst-case scenario.
The most common finding. Examples: trademark gaps in international markets, missing IP assignments from contractors, patents nearing expiry. These findings should translate into purchase price adjustments, post-closing obligations for the seller, or holdback provisions in the purchase agreement.
Fixable issues that the acquirer can address post-closing. Document these findings and budget for them. They are not reasons to kill a deal but they are costs that need to be factored in.
Ready to protect your IP?
Book a free 15-minute strategy call with Cameron Reid.
Book a Free Strategy CallAbout the Author
Cameron Reid is the cofounder of CrossBorder IP, where he advises SaaS companies, tech startups, e-commerce brands, and in-house legal teams on international IP strategy. With over 20 years of experience spanning Big Law, in-house counsel roles, and startup advisory, Cameron specialises in helping businesses protect and scale their IP globally — particularly across the US, Europe, and Asia-Pacific markets.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information about international IP strategy and should not be relied upon as legal advice. IP laws vary significantly by jurisdiction and every business situation is unique. For specific guidance on your IP protection needs, please consult with a qualified attorney in your jurisdiction.